Cursor vs Windsurf
Compare these two IDE Tools tools side-by-side to find the best fit for your project.

Cursor
IDE Tools
9.5/10
AI-first code editor built on VS Code with strong autocomplete, multi-file agent workflows, cloud agents, and review surfaces across editor, terminal, GitHub, and chat tools.
Visit SiteVS

Windsurf
IDE Tools
8.5/10
Agentic VS Code-based IDE centered on Cascade, inline commands, MCP connectivity, and flow-oriented multi-file coding with strong autocomplete and agent awareness.
Visit SiteQuick Verdict
Choose Cursor if:
- AI-native Editor
- Inline Generation
- Codebase-wide Edits
Choose Windsurf if:
- AI-native Editor
- Inline Generation
- Codebase-wide Edits
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Cursor | Windsurf |
|---|---|---|
| Category | IDE Tools | IDE Tools |
| Pricing Model | Freemium | Freemium |
| Starting Price | $20/mo | $20/mo |
| Rating | 9.5/10 | 8.5/10 |
| Complexity | Beginner-Friendly | Beginner-Friendly |
| AI Models | Claude, Copilot | Claude, Copilot |
| Integrations | GitHub, Slack, OpenAI | GitHub, GitLab, Discord, AWS |
| Best For | Developers who want an AI-first code editor built on VS Code with inline chat, generation, and tab completion. | Developers wanting an AI-native IDE with proactive Cascade flows that understand full project context. |
Cursor
Pros
- AI-native Editor
- Inline Generation
- Codebase-wide Edits
- Integrated Terminal
Considerations
- May require setup time
- Check pricing for your scale
Windsurf
Pros
- AI-native Editor
- Inline Generation
- Codebase-wide Edits
- Integrated Terminal
Considerations
- May require setup time
- Check pricing for your scale
